real vinyls /timecoded vinyls: differences of reactions

Hello
I hope I am posting in the right place, the forum has changed a lot since last time I've visited it.
I've seen the French forum has been archived. So it's out of use?
So I'll do my best here with my English
It's more a general question, concerning timecode mixing and real vinyl mixing. I've been using Mixvibes Cross (timecoded vinyls) for years and I am very happy with it.
I never have any problem with it, when used in a "proper" DJ booth (clubs used with V.turntables, speakers not too close ...).
A few times, problems occured when the scene was not optimal
(big scenes with vibrations). Usually, some cracks/slow down/ (very) instable BPM, indicating a bad signal because of vibrations or larsen ... no real solution, a part from tring to improve the scene set up.
It's just one fact I would like to clarify for my curiosity:
I've observed in those "dangerous" scenes set-ups:
- real vinyl players have less or no problems.
- other timecoded-vinyl-systems players have equivalent or worse problems.
For me it's logical, because a timecoded system has to "work more": Treating 1st analogical, than digital data.
Real vinyls have only an analogical data to work on.
But one organizer guy told me that it is the opposite:
Usually vinyls timecoded players have less difficulties because the software "compensates" the chaotic signals.
Now I am not sure.
Can somebody explain me what the truth is?
Just willing to learn general facts about the system

I hope I am posting in the right place, the forum has changed a lot since last time I've visited it.
I've seen the French forum has been archived. So it's out of use?
So I'll do my best here with my English

It's more a general question, concerning timecode mixing and real vinyl mixing. I've been using Mixvibes Cross (timecoded vinyls) for years and I am very happy with it.
I never have any problem with it, when used in a "proper" DJ booth (clubs used with V.turntables, speakers not too close ...).
A few times, problems occured when the scene was not optimal
(big scenes with vibrations). Usually, some cracks/slow down/ (very) instable BPM, indicating a bad signal because of vibrations or larsen ... no real solution, a part from tring to improve the scene set up.
It's just one fact I would like to clarify for my curiosity:
I've observed in those "dangerous" scenes set-ups:
- real vinyl players have less or no problems.
- other timecoded-vinyl-systems players have equivalent or worse problems.
For me it's logical, because a timecoded system has to "work more": Treating 1st analogical, than digital data.
Real vinyls have only an analogical data to work on.
But one organizer guy told me that it is the opposite:
Usually vinyls timecoded players have less difficulties because the software "compensates" the chaotic signals.
Now I am not sure.
Can somebody explain me what the truth is?

Just willing to learn general facts about the system
