Page 2 of 2

Re: new fx vst support

PostPosted: 07 Sep 2011, 18:58
by kelt
Blackbrook wrote:
sylMV wrote:but there's a huge drawback: the program stability can't be guaranted anymore... depending on the plugins you may load...


My suggestion: Anything that decreases the stability should not be implemented. Hopefully I am not the only one who is thinking so.

Cheers,

Steve


+1

Re: new fx vst support re-vap

PostPosted: 15 Sep 2011, 23:35
by mashuper
I know, that it's hard to make, but why VST Host can't be like another application? If plugin is broken, or not compatible with Cross, it will just kill VST host application, while Cross will go on. I know that it's hard to do, but that will make one less problem. Still wish for Low-Pass Filter, Phaser, Gater and Beat Repeater...

Re: new fx vst support re-vap

PostPosted: 16 Sep 2011, 08:42
by dj_cross_fade
mashuper wrote:I know, that it's hard to make, but why VST Host can't be like another application? If plugin is broken, or not compatible with Cross, it will just kill VST host application, while Cross will go on. I know that it's hard to do, but that will make one less problem. Still wish for Low-Pass Filter, Phaser, Gater and Beat Repeater...


im with u on this :D