Suggest features and improvements
by Blackbrook on 15 Feb 2013, 21:22
Guys,
I am reading the forum every day, posting less, but reading everything of what you leave during the day. I come across a lot of entries in the "suggestions" section where a lot of different people are asking for a lot of different features. In fact I can see Cross blowing up with every release. Don't think I'm with stupid, this is normal behaviour, I know.
I think, that it is about time to "fork" another Cross version. There is Cross, the flagship, including everything. There is CrossDJ, including MIDI controller and all technical features, all except timecode.
Asking me it is time for a Cross Mix/TimeCode/whatever version. Why? From my point of view there is sooooooo much stuff included in the current Cross version I don't need while using it as a "scratch system". I don't need samplers, I don't need locators, I even don't need effects. Yes, bringing the argument that I can hide most of the stuff through view is okay, but the feature is still there, using CPU and RAM, the modules are loaded. I am currently using Cross 1.7.1, thinking about going back to 1.5.1. It has all I need. A stripped down version would be great in my opinion. Just for timecode purposes.
What do you think of it?
Viele Grüße, Cheers, A plus, Steve Winner Mixvibes 10 years DJ contest 2009
-
Blackbrook
-
- Posts: 4417
- Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:33
by Jim B on 15 Feb 2013, 21:35
Blackbrook wrote: A stripped down version would be great in my opinion. Just for timecode purposes.
I agree, No Sampler, No FX's, No Locators, just 1 or 2 Cue points. That would do me just fine mate 
-
Jim B



-
- Posts: 1974
- Joined: 08 Jul 2009, 19:02
- Location: Nottingham, England
by daniel clark on 16 Feb 2013, 00:31
 on the same thought pattern ,, either options to turn off certain features or if hiding then will allow for less cpu usage then thats acceptable ,,  steve remember the problems with using a collection from 2.0 and above in versions earlier ,, take caution ,  liked 1.7 also but no sampler ,, so it 2.0 and above for me ,,havent even looked at 2.3 yet  and as a user  regerstered  you have the option of using any version ,,in the archived section of the download area  maybe a poll of what Cross version you like /fits your need and why in gen chat  like we did in the implemtation of the fx set up 
  January 2012 Mixvibes DJ of the month MEMBER OF:  C00l People MV Society  2014 dell XPS8700 intel core i5 4400@3.10ghz 12 gigs DDR3 ram NVDIA GeForce GT635 Win 10 /64 bits OS Realteck 7.1 Home USB sound dogle Asus VE247H monitor Logitec G-15 ser 1 gaming keyboard U-Mix Control Pro 2
-

daniel clark


-
- Posts: 6861
- Joined: 31 Oct 2008, 01:01
- Location: Charleston,S C
-
by UncleVibes on 16 Feb 2013, 12:53
Fully agree with Daniel
-
UncleVibes

-
- Posts: 10254
- Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 14:36
by Alexkidd on 25 Feb 2013, 15:21
i was thinking exactly the same thing here.
i'm still using 1.7.1 here myself for my timecode purposes.
+1 from me
but 4 locators would be essential.
-

Alexkidd

-
- Posts: 228
- Joined: 14 Jul 2011, 13:33
- Location: Greece
by Alexkidd on 23 Mar 2013, 19:34
no updates on this? would it be difficult? tested 1.7.1 today vs 2.3.1 and the have about 200mem difference and about 20% CPU just mixing and scratching.
I love the look and the layout of 2.3 more but i'm stuck with 1.7 here
-

Alexkidd

-
- Posts: 228
- Joined: 14 Jul 2011, 13:33
- Location: Greece
by Alexkidd on 23 Mar 2013, 20:04
daniel clark wrote::cool: yes 1.7 was good to run ,,,found happiness with 2.3 ,,everthing in between was a headacke for me 
yes this is really true. I'm really excited for 2.4 as well. Idon't care how late will it be, only thing that matters to me is stability nad buglessness(i made this word out  )
-

Alexkidd

-
- Posts: 228
- Joined: 14 Jul 2011, 13:33
- Location: Greece
Return to Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests
|
|
|