daniel clark wrote::cool:

just curious how its going to be implemented

MIDI controller and two t c turntables for the other two decks

then what about the sampler feature and all the sample stored
plus one or two sample banks
the possibilities are endless

Daniel, I am currious about the implementation too.
While I am sure the Mixvibes team will do a great job, my concern lies more with the controller posibilities.
Let's face it the UMCP-2 is a great controller, however (IMHO) the CrossDJ/Cross software has outgrown this controller.
I am currently supplementing the UMCP-2 with two Quneo MIDI controllers.
On the left is Quneo #1 controlling Sampler C and Player A, just for the pad functions and other things not mapped in the UMCP-2. (like individualy trigerred loops and all 8 sample pads with bigger pads and grouped for performance)
In the middle is the UMCP-2 with all its current fuctions.
On the right is Quneo #2 controlling Player B and Sampler D in the same configuration as Quneo #1.
This set up is working great, however, with the addition of 2 additional decks (assuming a total of 4 deck each with 8 locators and 2 samplers) I am looking for an all in one controller. iam thinking about the DDJ-SX.
The problem with the DDJ-SX is that there is no official or un-official full mapping to Cross. I know some people are working on it but nothing that has been shared yet and the output mapping for LED control in Cross needs to grow a bit to be more user friendly.
I am hesitant to spent 1000.00 USD on a controller that I am not certain it will work with Cross.
Also I can get into output mapping and done so with the Quneos but I think this section could be implemented with a little more automatization from Cross to make it more user friendly like the input MIDI mapping section.
I think Mixvibes would do great to come up with an updated controller that is perhaps bigger in size but fully mapped to the software. I know I would jump on that if it existed. I also know about controllers like the VCI-380 and 400 but they present somewaht the same problems when looking at the output section
Note: My comment are not intended to be controversial and just apply to my particular workflow. Others may agree or disagree but I don't mean to offend or make anyone angry. Just my 2 cents.